rewrite this title Revdi Culture, Freebies or Gimmick? With mounting state debts and revenue deficits, are we sacrificing long-term development for short-term gains?

“Free electricity, free water, free…free…free.” Political speeches are filled with promises of freebies. But are these schemes beneficial welfare measures or unsustainable election strategies? Let’s unpack the debate.

Welfare schemes aim to uplift the society by providing essential services like free education, healthcare and subsidized food. Bihar’s Chakra scheme for girls in 2006 increased access to education, while the mid-day meal program improved child nutrition. Similarly, BJP’s scooter scheme for college girls and AAP’s mohalla clinics serve long-term development goals.

However, without “free” social benefits such as distributing alcohol, cash, or non-essential items during elections, they run the risk of depleting state finances. The difference lies in intention and execution – the welfare creates, while the trivial exploits.

States like Tamil Nadu, Maharashtra and Uttar Pradesh are reeling under huge debt. Tamil Nadu’s debt-to-GDP ratio of 25.63% is a warning sign. Even BJP ruled states like Madhya Pradesh provide cash handouts like Laadli Behna Scheme, which costs ₹1600 crore monthly. Still, these states struggle with fiscal deficits.

way forward

Cash transfer schemes can provide short-term relief, as shown by global studies that link them to better health and less poverty. But unfulfilled promises without budget clarity hurt long-term growth. For example, India spends just 2.5% of its GDP on education, far from the recommended 6%. Healthcare budget is no better at less than 2%.

If welfare is to be achieved, it needs planning, transparency and stability. Without these, there is a risk of making costly mistakes, not free solutions. Citizens should question these promises – what is free today may cost the country a lot tomorrow.