rewrite this content and keep HTML tags
Sign-off, “completely avoidable”, was definitely correct. However, recently there are more danger to the spirit of clothes, general condition and constitutional morality in India. For example, when an MP along with an MP called a one belonging to a minority community, the name B. A (Broker), Cutting (circumcision), Mullah (Islamic preacher), atankwadi (Terrorist), and Ugravad (Terrorist), on the floor of the Lok Sabha.
Weighing the definite consequences of dangerous and legitimate polarization within the ‘Temple of Democracy’ – Vij Vij An improper remarks on the President, personally – the office on Raisina Hill chose to address the latter, not East.
Despite many serious concerns, violence in Manipur, agrarian crisis, polarization, unemployment, or even India’s fragmented relations with other countries, anyone was not considered eligible to express the concern of the President for the executive. Is. This is contrary to the choice of Ker Narayanan of a President, who refund the ‘files for reconsideration’, tampering his own script to make a subtle contradictory points to the government, and writes a letter of concern to the then Prime Minister, as That he did it after 2002. Communal riots.
India and Indian politics were better for constitutional maturity and fearlessness, as expressed by the choice of Kryan or APJ Abdul Kalam.
(The author is the Andaman and Nicobar Islands and a former LT Governor of Puducherry. It is a piece of opinion, and the idea expressed above is his own. The Quint Neither endors nor responsible for the same.)
