rewrite this content and keep HTML tags
Angered exchange was the difference between the so-called “mineral deal” between the Trump administration and the Ukrainian government that Zelancesi was determined to sign. But any lack of Ukrainian enthusiasm for the deal is understood.
The deal on the proposal is that the “reconstruction will be called investment fund”, jointly to America’s ownership and managed and Ukraine.
The proposed fund “will” go to 50 percent of revenue from exploitation of natural resource assets (whether directly or indirect ownership by the Ukrainian government) in the proposed fund “and” natural resource assets (such as natural gas terminals and port infrastructure) relevant to “natural resource assets and port infrastructure”.
This means that private infrastructure – most of its part of Ukraine’s rich aristocrats – is likely to be part of the deal. It has the ability to and growing between Zelanski and some very powerful Ukrainians.
Meanwhile, American contributions are less clearly defined. The preface of the agreement makes it clear that Ukraine is already outstanding the US. Paragraphs long ago stated that “the United States has provided significant financial and physical assistance to Ukraine since the United States of Ukraine’s full -scale invasion in February 2022”.
According to Trump, this figure is $ 350 billion (£ 278 billion). According to the Ukraine Support Tracker of the Kail Institute for the world economy, the actual amount is about half.
Since the current draft leaves details on ownership, governance and operations determined in the future fund agreement, Trump’s great deal is the best first step. Future talks are to be expected to be expected.
