And at this point, the conversation moves towards the base, as it has been increasing a terrible debate around the exclusion.
He lifts weight, “What is important to me that we are within which framework? There are issues of security and corruption. If there is a violation in security, you become very weak for the state. Like all big data undertakings, it is used.” Bhabha feels that the base is very useful, but he needs to work within a dialogue democratic location. “People should feel that their rights are protected,” he insists.
Protection of rights attacks a bitter note in the context of ongoing protests around Padmaavat, Where violence by Karni Sena is also in the name of rights.
Right to be angry.
Bhabha claims that no one has the right to destroy any piece of art or structure -Babri Masjid. “These are not tasks on the basis of rights. These are tasks to implement a certain type of reading of history. These are criminal acts.”
He brings back the memory of MF Hussain’s hounding due to his naked depiction of Hindu Goddesses. His big thing is about education. He says people were angry because they were not informed about the location of sexuality in Hindu mythology. If Naysayers knew better, they would have done better. “Nudity is not pornography for an artist.” He also saves Hussain against the allegation that he never depicted the figure in a similar way with Islamic belief. “But Islam does not allow any representation of any kind.”
