Today Breaking News LIVE: आज 15 मार्च 2025 के मुख्य समाचार| Sambhal | Holi | Pakistan Train Hijack
Thursday, the Supreme Court rebuked the “Utar Pradesh Police” on the occasion of the rape of the gang, saying verbally that it was “biased” and the law on transformation on that case was.
“I don’t want to use the word, the state police are also biased.” How can it be? ” The facts speak for themselves, and you are not the conversion for anything when two judges’ bench is presided over.
The Benchenev, which included Justice Sanjay Kumar, listened to the appeal, which challenged on September 5, 2024, the high court order of Allaabad, who was accused of violently resorting to Hindu wife, who already had “Nika”.
He captured the pledge, the NGO said that “the Constitution is the right to freedom of religion, religion and religion, which will be transformed.”
Before the high court order marks the names of the main accused (mediator), the first court in February 14 that the plaintiff’s names, as well as the complainant / victim, were “suppressed”.
On February 14, 2008, the court told the issue of the problem of punishment that “it is an accident, but the lawsuit is accused earlier.” On Thursday, the council told the bench that he was in prison in the last eight months … “Because just to help the lady.”
However, the condition said that it also includes accusations of gang rape and demanded time to apply for reverse communication.
History continues under this ad
CJI interrogated the application of counter-attack on this issue. “There is nothing in it. You are not fair in it, the state is not fair to this issue.”
Benchin gave the state for five days to face his counter and five days after, after the applicant to submit any rejoinder Affidavit.
Noting some contradictions, the court also asked for the notification service of one of the respondents in the official report. The court will now listen to 21 April 2025.
According to the HC order, the Western Bengal woman announced that she had gone with her daughter with her daughter earlier marriage. He also claimed that the accused and co-authors were bolred. He also supposedly changed his minor daughter.
History continues under this ad
The accused claimed that he “falsely assumed … aiming to cause unnecessary encroachments and sacrifice him.”
He said that the woman was “born of the child from her earlier body, with some other man and was not married to him.” He said that his wife was aware of his religion since the beginning of the relationship, that he was married.
The accused said he married him “beyond his desire, as well as in the presence of family members,” he said.
He said that “the names of” woman “and his daughter AADHAAR CARD His free will and agreement are agreed, “he” never forced them to change their names. “
History continues under this ad
After their applications, the NGO said that the accused “categorically confessed to the fact that he married the victim’s Muslim customs.” “There is nothing in the post that any application is transferred to U / S 8 for the illegal transformation of the religious act, 2021 for the transformation of the information from that marriage ceremony.
