Gujarat. RO plants where water is scarce, 35 km from school, abnormalities were found in medium term | Ahmedabad news

The project includes all villages, semi-annual and urban areas, located from 0 to 10 km (air away) from the first settlement of the international border.

According to BADP guidelines for 2015, the country’s equipment requires basic opportunities, such as road connection, schools, sports, health services, electricity, water supply, community centers (particularly for women).

None of the 185 villages in the area of ​​0-10 km from the border could appear until July 2023, even “saturated”, which was supposed to be on local conditions when this audit continued.

Moreover, since this is a border scheme, the priority should be given to the villages found by border troops as strategic villages. In this case, it is the power of border security (BSF). However, according to the CAG report, “the department said, the BSF participation was provided in April 2022, and the priority was given a list of the strategic conference proposed by the BSF.

Planning and evaluation or lack of

“The regional authorities have not implemented the” Need Analysis “in the border research in the border research to assess the gaps in basic physical and social infrastructure,” said the report.

Only the regional level of the regional level in Tata (DLC) held all five-year-old meetings for the 2016-20 annual Action Plan (AAP). The banister did not meet in 2019-20 and 20-2021. Moreover, the person also had five meetings.

“In these five years, the State Level Government Committee (SLESC) also held five five matches.

Moreover, several delays in presenting the DLCs at the state level during the five years under the audited, and the state later postponed the Government of India (Ghana). In five years, delays ranged from 45 days to 196 days.

The example of unforeseen projects in the projects is that the center approved 10,86 RSA Cred to excellence (CES) – one for hospitality, and the other was crumbling at the Cutt av. The Housing Corporation of the Gugarat Police Police (GSPHC) was allocated as works in 2019. However, it turned out that the land of Kochi was not suitable until the land in Vatan was a forest land. For both projects, the redistribution of soil was redistributed in 2020, but the GSPPC informed that the funds are insufficient. Then the project was given to the work and labor department, but they said that there are already industrial educational institutions in these areas, and in this way, the coins were not required. They have finally been canceled in February 2022.

Health, social sector is constantly ignored

“There was a deviation from the proposed share of funds for various areas under Badp. As a result, the healthcare sector and the social sphere were constantly remembered during a period of 2016-17 to 2019-20.Covid 19) “,” Said the report.

In total, 958 works were taken, around which only 241 (25%) project was completed during the relevant soap.

Violation of guidelines, irregular use of funds

During the 2016-17 and 2019-20, a total of 133 (12.16%) work costs Rs 20.089 Crore canceled without the center’s approval. These cancellations, the department, again, without GOI approval, punished 50 new works, which co-oped down to 22,93 Rs. The department said with the audit that the confirmation of Post Facto was searched by GOI. However, this still violated the provisions of BADP guidelines.

The audit noticed that DHUTCH was organized in DHORDO on November 2020. Although the Gujarati government’s home department asked GOI to provide the Foundation spent on the exhibition. The state used 6.27 Rs Rs from its BADP’s share, but the audit found that no additional measures were provided by the state to make these expenses.

Although the missing competitions should be invited to 5 lakhs and 30 lakhs of 30 Lakh Lakhs, there were seven works united in 2016-17 and 2017-18. This included the creation of LED street lights in two villages of Banaskantha.

There were also cases when unnecessary payment was made to contractors for unfinished cases. The Department of Tax 20, which was inadmissible, executed the Department of Tax, which was inadmissible due to BADP guidelines. 37.93 Liquid damage in Rs did not restore contractors at the time of recording or paying final bills.

There is no asset inventory

Under the BADP guide, the government must maintain the inventory of the assets created within the framework of the program. These assets must be Geo-Cap and uploaded with special thematic strips of BHUVAN Platform / Badp-OMS.

However, in 2016-17 and 2019-20, while the total 958 works, neither the state and non-districts were under investment under the daddy. In addition, neither those assets geo-capped nor their details uploaded on the online platform.

Unjust infrastructure

Some of the examples of unhealthy structure include:

1. The AAP of 2015-16, the construction of a student dormitory in Cave 2015, ended in March 2019 with a value of 38.75 lakh Rs. The audit was observed in June 2022 that the dormitory is 2.5 km from the nearest settlement and 3.5 km from the village of Chamda. Moreover, it was built on private land of trust. The dormitory was 35 km from the residential school of Goreval village. It was unused until July 2023.

2. The milk collection center in Khatya village is over in August 2017 with the value of 5 Lakhs. The center has never been used, noting that the work is planned without “analysis needs”.

3. The drilling of seven tubular wells in the five villages of Kovchi, located in the five villages of Kochi, has been approved at 91 lakhs Rs. The project was canceled in September 2020.

4: RO plants were completed in the main schools of five villages in the 5 villages of the Banison District in April 2018 with a value of 16 lakhs. However, in the villages of Chothar Nesda and Rankena, the plants were not applied until August 2022. It happens that it is due to water scarcity.

5. The village of Vanda of Lamb is 3.5 km from Gadululi. However, in 2016-17, the R & B Pan Khayat section offered only 2.5 km long road construction at the cost of 70 GEL. At the time of technical sanction, the same division noted that only 1.5 km road can be built with the approval of Rs 1 Crore. As a result, in front of 3.5 km, in fact, only 1.5 km roads were built at the cost of 60.60 GEL. The rest of the stretch left Kuuta’s road, as of July 20, 2023.