The state government cannot remove any part of the employee’s pension, gratitude or cash without a clear statutory provision.
The court listened to a case that included Rajkut Gink, a minister from Chinakh, Madha Pradesh, who is now dead.
Recently, Bibu Datha Guru said:
He added that the right to property was protected under Article 300 of the Constitution and could not be removed without a proper process.
Mr. The geouse was retired as a deputy director in January 2018. After pension, the government presented a notice of submission in the presumed illegal appropriation.
Show notice is a competent formal document (both the government or employer) asking a person to explain or justify their actions.
Mr. Genlar denied all accusations, both during the service and its response to the exhibition was given on December 13, 2018. However, the state moved to recovery.
The Supreme Court noted that the recovery was ordered without any official or judicial conclusion without guilt.
Quoting the previous supreme court judgments, the court stressed to provide a reasonable opportunity before imposing a financial penalty on retirees.
Calling restoration “Unstable”, the court set aside the government’s order and sent the return of the recycled amount to Mr. Gum’s family in 45 days.
Mr. Gohar died on June 20 2024. His legitimate heirs later added to the case.
