On Friday, the Minister of Cooperative Karnataki Ragan expressed a sensational statement that the “Disco -Disk factories” acted in the state, which led to incidents with a honey trap. He even stated that he had evidence to support his allegations. However, until Tuesday he completely abandoned his statement.
Karnatak’s policy reached a new minimum after the trap trap trap was central. Recent events, in particular, switching to Rajan’s Minister, raised several questions unanswered. On Tuesday night, Rajan presented a letter to the Minister of Internal Affairs D -R Parameswar, who caused speculation about his political security. The sudden change in his statements only deepened the secret.
Turn: What has changed for the wounded?
On Friday, the Minister of Cooperative Karnataki Ragan expressed a sensational statement that the “Disco -Disk factories” acted in the state, which led to incidents with a honey trap. He even stated that he had evidence to support his allegations. However, until Tuesday, he completely abandoned his statement, saying that there was no evidence and that he could be mistaken.
What caused this sudden shift?
Political pressure in the game?
On Sunday, the President of AICC Mallikarjun Harge met with Chief Minister Siddramai for a detailed discussion. After this high -level meeting, the position of the injury seemed to be significantly mitated.
On Friday, the son of the wedding, MLC Rajendra, confirmed in an interview with Zee News that they received suspicious WhatsApp video calls.
By Tuesday, Minister Rajan told about another history in the media:
Two months ago, in Madhugir Taluk, a woman in the blue top and jeans approached him, asking for a private conversation. He ignored her.
A few days later, the same woman – then, said she was a lawyer of the Supreme Court – removed him in the Bengalur government, looking for a discussion on the case.
Feeling something suspicious, Rajan ordered an investigation into his contacts and allegedly revealed an attempt by a honey trap.
However, he later retreated, citing the lack of CCTV camera at the Bengalur Government House as a reason for revising his claims.
Despite this reversal, Rajan continued to meet with the Minister of Internal Affairs, Dr. G. Parameshvara and submitted an investigation request. Addressing the media, the parameter clarified:
“This is not an official complaint, and at this stage, FIR cannot be registered. However, I will consult the chief minister about how to continue.”
Key questions unanswered
1. Rajan said no CCTV cameras were installed at the Bengalur government residence, but what about Madhugir’s residence in the Tumakur area?
2. Ever since Rajana and his son have received a WhatsApp video call from the alleged gang, why did they not trace the phone numbers?
3. If the wounded team revealed information about the gang trap, do they have photos or other evidence?
4. On Friday, Rardra claimed to have evidence. Did he retreated from the pressure from the high command?
5. If Rajan was really a victim, why not file a complaint to the police rather than just filed the Interior Minister?
6. Did Rajana use the assembly session to send a message to a high command, or he fell silent after the Harge meeting with Siddaramia?
7. If others are involved in the case of honey trap, why Ragan and his son say they will perform a high command instead of law enforcement?
Will the truth come out?
With several questions unanswered, the trap trap trap has taken a political turn. Although the time can happen, there are long doubts: was the voice wounded? Was it more than meets with the eye?
While Karnataka is waiting for the answers.
